Punch! CAD
»
ViaCAD & Shark
»
Surface Modeling
»
Sweep curve along 2 guides - sweep fails to respect curve
Rank: Guest
Joined: 9/27/2017(UTC) Posts: 231
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 22 time(s) in 19 post(s)
Sweep curve along 2 guides - sweep fails to respect drive curve
This has been like this forever - in fact, perhaps there's logic to say it shouldn't work anyway
Be great if someone could look at it and say why the driven curve is not respected
... and can anything be done about it
Thank you !
Jol
File Attachment(s):
sweep 2 guide issue.sfx
(16kb) downloaded 13 time(s). Jolyon attached the following image(s):
2 rail sweep fail.jpg
(45kb) downloaded 10 time(s). You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
1 user thanked Jolyon for this useful post.
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 2/16/2007(UTC) Posts: 604
Thanks: 156 times Was thanked: 154 time(s) in 105 post(s)
Hi Jol,
Don't know if this is what you want, seems to work on the PC.
Larry
File Attachment(s):
sweep 2 guide issue2.sfx
(107kb) downloaded 5 time(s). L. Banasky attached the following image(s):
sweep 2 guide issue2.jpg
(116kb) downloaded 8 time(s). You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Rank: Guest
Joined: 9/27/2017(UTC) Posts: 231
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 22 time(s) in 19 post(s)
Many thanks Larry ! - Could somebody with a Mac have a look for me ... perhaps this is a Mac / PC thing !? Or perhaps I'm doing some thing daft ? Thanks again Larry ! Jol
Rank: Guest
Joined: 9/27/2017(UTC) Posts: 231
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 22 time(s) in 19 post(s)
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 4/29/2015(UTC) Posts: 73
Thanks: 4 times Was thanked: 65 time(s) in 33 post(s)
Modify your end slope so it's not so sharp.
mitchb attached the following image(s):
Screen Shot 1.png
(113kb) downloaded 1 time(s). Screen Shot 2.png
(115kb) downloaded 2 time(s). You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Rank: Guest
Joined: 9/27/2017(UTC) Posts: 231
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 22 time(s) in 19 post(s)
Hi MitchB I've tried your suggestion - this just lessons the issue, but the issue remains Perhaps you're on a PC - and this is a Mac issue ? (I'm not really looking for a workaround. I'm looking to highlight longstanding issues so they can be rectified and not ignored) I note that your solution looks wavy - I also had this issue in my experimentation Perhaps if any of the devs go through these forum entries - they can look at that too Thanks Mitch for your help Jol
Rank: Guest
Joined: 9/27/2017(UTC) Posts: 231
Thanks: 1 times Was thanked: 22 time(s) in 19 post(s)
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 9/12/2009(UTC)
Posts: 608
Location: In my place
Was thanked: 59 time(s) in 51 post(s)
I'm on a mac. I can confirm the same result but only if I go from left to right when picking the curves to sweep. If you pick from right to left and maintain the height with the OPTION key held down, you get a better result with the 2 guide rail sweep. I know Larry attempted it with the guide sweep surface as a solution, which is not the same command and also gives sort of a kink in the surface when you zoom in. In my CAD experience, it is better you go with four curves instead of three since you still need maintain tangency with whatever this is patching.
FX 7-FXPro14-1650
MacPro 11.7.4
2x2.8GHz Quad Xeon 32GB
NVIDIA 4 K5000 4GB
Work
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 3/21/2017(UTC)
Posts: 954
Thanks: 46 times Was thanked: 321 time(s) in 213 post(s)
I've just tried it in shark on a PC, and if I go right to left on the two curves it's almost on the lower sweeping curve. If I go left to right it's way off like the original image.
Tried it in V11 pro and it had a fit, and eventually gave the same results as shark although moving the model around was very jittery after this.
Guided skin surface works ok, but there is a blip in the top of the longer edge for whatever reason...
Edited by user Tuesday, December 4, 2018 1:46:58 PM(UTC)
| Reason: More detail added
File Attachment(s):
sweep 2 guide issue.slt
(74kb) downloaded 0 time(s). You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 9/12/2009(UTC)
Posts: 608
Location: In my place
Was thanked: 59 time(s) in 51 post(s)
Better to go with four curves and do a net surface. Who knows what the calculations might be doing. You suspect it will behave correctly intuitively but the math behind it might not allow it thus you get a space or way off. Maybe if someone has another spatial engine in another CAD and try out the curves to confirm this.. My Rhino is too old to try.
FX 7-FXPro14-1650
MacPro 11.7.4
2x2.8GHz Quad Xeon 32GB
NVIDIA 4 K5000 4GB
Work
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 3/21/2017(UTC)
Posts: 954
Thanks: 46 times Was thanked: 321 time(s) in 213 post(s)
I can stick them through Catia tomorrow but I've done something similar, and got different results. Visually I preferred the Shark result, only because I knew what the resulting surface should have looked like. Although the Catia surface appeared to go away from what I wanted.
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 3/21/2017(UTC)
Posts: 954
Thanks: 46 times Was thanked: 321 time(s) in 213 post(s)
Straight off the commands Catia can't figure it out. NX however produces a nice surface. It's almost the same as what Shark can do, only the one in NX grips the bottom edge better.
File Attachment(s):
NX 9.zip
(1,852kb) downloaded 5 time(s). NX 9.igs
(315kb) downloaded 11 time(s). NX 9.txt
(3kb) downloaded 6 time(s). You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 9/12/2009(UTC)
Posts: 608
Location: In my place
Was thanked: 59 time(s) in 51 post(s)
Originally Posted by: UGMENTALCASE Straight off the commands Catia can't figure it out. NX however produces a nice surface. It's almost the same as what Shark can do, only the one in NX grips the bottom edge better.
You would think that it will be identical assuming they both use the same engine. I don't know much about NX but it does sound like a higher end CAD software. I guess you get what you paid for.
Maybe it is time to start looking around since Punch is going in a different direction and our voices are not heard.
FX 7-FXPro14-1650
MacPro 11.7.4
2x2.8GHz Quad Xeon 32GB
NVIDIA 4 K5000 4GB
Work
Rank: Guest
Joined: 12/24/2018(UTC) Posts: 1
It was really good to read this post and it
Dyson Coupons helped me a lot thank for such a useful post keep posting
Rank: Guest
Joined: 10/16/2018(UTC)
Posts: 7
Originally Posted by: Jolyon Sweep curve along 2 guides - sweep fails to respect drive curve This has been like this forever - in fact, perhaps there's logic to say it shouldn't work anyway Be great if someone could look at it and say why the driven curve is not respected ... and can anything be done about it Thank you ! Jol
The issue has been reported to the development team for a fix.
I'll let you know once it's fixed.
Shaheryar
Edited by user Wednesday, December 26, 2018 6:10:30 AM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
Regards, Shaheryar Rafiq QA & Support Engineer
Punch! CAD
»
ViaCAD & Shark
»
Surface Modeling
»
Sweep curve along 2 guides - sweep fails to respect curve
Forum Jump
Punch! CAD
ViaCAD & Shark
- News and Announcements
- General
- 2D Drafting
- Surface Modeling
- Solid Modeling
- Subdivision Modeling
- Rendering & Display
- Import/Export
- Tips and Tutorials
- Suggestions
- Gallery
- PowerPack
- Punch Lounge
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.