Edit
hello,
My english is very bad, sorry. this is traduction with Google.
Hello,
I deal with the teaching of CAD for industrial designers and for architects.
Shark is very well suited to the profession of the designer but is less responsive to the needs of architects.
Including the fact that Shark does not see "through walls" like any good software architecture.
The trick to this was to remove the wall side view to see within its architectural space. Not practical.
The other problem is the ergonomics perspective of setting the scene that are not easy as proposed in the interface of the range perspective, properties views.
I am user of a software architecture, I can bring my modest contribution to a possible challenge to the ergonomics of these settings themselves.
Getting started: I think a picture is worth a thousand words .... therefore a range of settings more intuitive and visual, see attached file.
the adjustment procedure that is frequently encountered in these software is:
1. get to top view.
2. trace a line from the start of the "user view" until the "point of sight."
3. at that time a range of settings is displayed, eg attachment.
4. the designer only has to fill the "height of the point of view", "height of the point of sight", "focal" possibly "force the vertical options to avoid defects parallaxes.
There.
Small precision: with this example I'm not trying to "enter" in a full solid model, but in an architectural model, so in a space designed and physically free.
Thanks.
Best regards.
Antoine
la mouche attached the following image(s):
perspective.jpg
(48kb) downloaded 0 time(s).You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.