Depending on your point of view of international politics and to impartiality as long as the thing you're doing or using is fair to whomever you're trying to help, your choice of tools might be hindered.
~ Goal could be to "take the profit out of AI software..."...
Open Source AI models could cause turmoil because some models keep jumping back to the front of the line or front of the pack, especially by enabling users to develop own weights and evade vendor lock-in by vendors charging way more than what users can afford or need.
Moreover, depending on how companies expense R&D and tesining, it could be cost prohibitive to even intern people, buy necessary tools and apps, and commit to expanding features or services.
Early in the video he shows some lineage searching tools that expose who may be using which branch of AI code and how they jump around while trying to soft-hide their source AI.
My opinions below...
I hope Tim and team have a plug-and-play or hot swappable brain socket that won't be beholden to any AI regardless of the AI origin.
Otherwise, CAD and any other apps could be destroyed if they become too hardwired to something that keeps being outperformed every other week. That could ne incredibly disruptive and unsustainable, making users just want an external AI that won't have any agency over or into the CAD app itself. Just let AI read rhe geometry from a quarantine area so it can't directly alter or ruin live work.
"Deepseek just BROKE the Entire AI Industry... (something is up)"
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ouaoJlh3DB4&Wes Roth
126k views
2 days ago
12m 37s
