logo
NOTICE:  This is the new PunchCAD forum. You should have received an email with your new password around August 27, 2014. If you did not, or would like it reset, simply use the Lost Password feature, and enter Answer as the security answer.
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
UGMENTALCASE  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, March 7, 2018 5:18:58 AM(UTC)
UGMENTALCASE

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 3/21/2017(UTC)
Posts: 952
Man
United Kingdom

Thanks: 46 times
Was thanked: 319 time(s) in 212 post(s)
I have a simple plate, put 3 holes in it, and used the assembly 'constraints' to align face to face, and hole centre to hole centre. Image 1 below.

If I then want to align using point to point, the hole at 45°, the whole part moves, totally ignoring the first hole 'constraint'. Yet the mating 'constraints' are all still in the history tree? All 3 of them, yet 1 of them isn't working right? Is this what's supposed to happen? Only I wouldn't have thought so?

What I see here is, if I start manually rotating (using the gripper) the parts rename to instance.... and so on. Which personally I don't like. I name them a certain way for a reason. So if I use these constraints, this way they don't get renamed. But from what I'm seeing, they also don't work very well?

Any thoughts on this?
UGMENTALCASE attached the following image(s):
image_1.png (152kb) downloaded 17 time(s).
image_2.png (113kb) downloaded 12 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
NeuTechFLA  
#2 Posted : Thursday, March 8, 2018 7:48:28 AM(UTC)
NeuTechFLA

Rank: Guest

Joined: 12/14/2017(UTC)
Posts: 263

Thanks: 31 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 12 post(s)
In CREO we see this at times IF and only IF: the first component (I.E. your block) is assembled with "Package" (I.E. no assembly constraints) and left to float in space. Then when something is assembled (I.E. your two holed plate) to the first component and the second and/or third constraints (hole distances in this case) are not identical numerically to the first, the software will go a bit wonky and move the parts in an effort to match them.

Are your hole center line distances exactly the same on both parts? From the picture they look different.

Also, I have not done a lot of "assembly" work in Shark yet. Is there a component "lock" available to keep the first part in its position?

Edited by user Thursday, March 8, 2018 7:51:43 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Jolyon  
#3 Posted : Thursday, March 8, 2018 7:58:02 AM(UTC)
Jolyon

Rank: Guest

Joined: 9/27/2017(UTC)
Posts: 231

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 22 time(s) in 19 post(s)
edit>group>lock ??

[

yes, even if it's not a group !

no, that doesn't make sense : )

]

Edited by user Thursday, March 8, 2018 7:59:39 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

UGMENTALCASE  
#4 Posted : Thursday, March 8, 2018 11:31:35 AM(UTC)
UGMENTALCASE

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 3/21/2017(UTC)
Posts: 952
Man
United Kingdom

Thanks: 46 times
Was thanked: 319 time(s) in 212 post(s)
Hi, thanks for the reply. I'll try the suggestions. I did try the lock feature, it locked one constraint, and then when I tried to lock a different constraint it locked the whole part!
Probably another issue :-)

But yes all holes etc are exactly the same distance apart.

I'll try tonight and post back :-)
thanks 1 user thanked UGMENTALCASE for this useful post.
NeuTechFLA on 3/8/2018(UTC)
UGMENTALCASE  
#5 Posted : Thursday, March 8, 2018 11:59:36 AM(UTC)
UGMENTALCASE

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 3/21/2017(UTC)
Posts: 952
Man
United Kingdom

Thanks: 46 times
Was thanked: 319 time(s) in 212 post(s)
errrrrr................. basically no :-)

If you lock it you can't select it. Tried adding in a solid to constrain too, and then locked said solid, and tried the same thing, another plate and aligning the holes, and it just does the same thing.

I know in the likes of NX you have to nurse it round a bit, especially if you go to 180°, NX does not like 180°! But I've tried pretty much everything I can think of here, and it's not doing what I would've thought it should.

If I align it to one hole, then move that hole, the aligned plate goes with it, so it must work like this?!?!?!
NeuTechFLA  
#6 Posted : Thursday, March 8, 2018 12:57:21 PM(UTC)
NeuTechFLA

Rank: Guest

Joined: 12/14/2017(UTC)
Posts: 263

Thanks: 31 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 12 post(s)
UGMENTALCASE....I got mine to work with a 3 point rotate. Could not get the assembly tool to rotate the part to the two holes.

Edited by user Thursday, March 8, 2018 1:00:59 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

NeuTechFLA attached the following image(s):
UG-1.jpg (369kb) downloaded 9 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
UGMENTALCASE  
#7 Posted : Thursday, March 8, 2018 1:39:38 PM(UTC)
UGMENTALCASE

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 3/21/2017(UTC)
Posts: 952
Man
United Kingdom

Thanks: 46 times
Was thanked: 319 time(s) in 212 post(s)
Hi Dean,

Yes I've used that a few times nice little tool. I'm going to try 3 point rotate, then align the faces when they are already aligned, then move the hole and see what happens. I think I know what will happen!

Cheers
UGMENTALCASE  
#8 Posted : Friday, March 9, 2018 2:55:28 AM(UTC)
UGMENTALCASE

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 3/21/2017(UTC)
Posts: 952
Man
United Kingdom

Thanks: 46 times
Was thanked: 319 time(s) in 212 post(s)
Yeah no that didn't work! It basically uses the last align and forgets the others. Using the 3 point align gives you a name change as well. VCMENTALCASE is building.......

Edited by user Friday, March 9, 2018 2:56:31 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

File Attachment(s):
TRANSLATE CHANGES NAME.mp4 (2,100kb) downloaded 8 time(s).
USING CONSTRAINTS KEEPS THE NAME.mp4 (1,409kb) downloaded 6 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
NeuTechFLA  
#9 Posted : Friday, March 9, 2018 7:11:59 AM(UTC)
NeuTechFLA

Rank: Guest

Joined: 12/14/2017(UTC)
Posts: 263

Thanks: 31 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 12 post(s)
Let me know when the name change is official!

When I first started using Shark that name change thing boggled my head. I saw the "translate widget" and could not understand where the prt001 went. I didn't hover over that for too long and moved on to other things. Now I see it's "in there" like lemons are in lemonade. That is a goof if I have ever seen one.
UGMENTALCASE  
#10 Posted : Friday, March 9, 2018 7:39:48 AM(UTC)
UGMENTALCASE

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 3/21/2017(UTC)
Posts: 952
Man
United Kingdom

Thanks: 46 times
Was thanked: 319 time(s) in 212 post(s)
Yep! I get it, should be in the history so you can go back through all steps, but then when you have a bunch of stuff on screen, and you try and select something you have moved, oh hang on the part name has gone! Unless you go and rename the 'translate' in the tree to your part number, then it shows up ok.
UGMENTALCASE  
#11 Posted : Friday, April 6, 2018 1:06:37 PM(UTC)
UGMENTALCASE

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 3/21/2017(UTC)
Posts: 952
Man
United Kingdom

Thanks: 46 times
Was thanked: 319 time(s) in 212 post(s)
Is there anymore information available for this align feature I mentioned a while back? Just wondering if it should work how I mention or not?
Seems strange it would forget 1 constraint but not others?
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.