Good input Tom :)
tmay wrote:
I prefer to assemble in a separate window/file using part files that I have previously created. Currently , I open a part file, copy, open the assembly file, paste, and then use mate/connect starting with my base part. It would be useful via mate/connect to open a part from a list of recent parts, or to browse, perhaps with an icon of the part. This would save a lot of steps.
Yes, Very similar to Solidworks; during assembly in Solidworks, a small window to the left of the main assembly screen is open showing a list of parts. One simply drags parts into the assembly screen from that window. An icon is also at the top of this small screen, that denotes an operation to continue to hold this window open (shown as a pin icon), until the designer chooses to 'release the pin' (radio button), closing the window. Items in the assembly screen can then be assembled accordingly, using the mating functions.
Actually there is a lot in favour for the existing Shark/ VC assembly method, as it is geared nicely towards creating a model from scratch (bottom up assembly). New layers can be added to create new parts, then if parts need to be milled or tooled off, STL files can be created from the individual layers.
HOWEVER.....
If there is
also the type of assembly available which works in a similar manner to how Tom describes, this would make Shark exceptionally powerful, much more powerful than both Solidworks and 3DS Max.
tmay wrote:
Also, it would be nice to have alignment/rotation added into mate/connect, to save having to return to a separate rotation operation.
Yes- including parametric relations to mates, like a concentric relationship on a shaft, for eg making an engine or a hinge for a door etc? Tom, it sounds like you are requesting a feature to flip the orientation of the part (also ala Solidworks) on a right click or control-click (single click Apple mouse)? A very useful feature. I'd also like to suggest being able to orient
individual parts in an assembly window too. Again similar to SW's- but probably very similar to all the other Spatial-based CAD apps too?
tmay wrote:
Secondly, I tried some top-down assembly, where I was using features on one part to create features on a second part. No problem with that, but I would like to be able to save those created parts as separate files after creation. If I copy and paste into a new file, I lose the feature tree ( I may have to try duplicate)
This sounds like it either is a bug, or a hangover from a time where files were kept to a minimum in size in order to be stored on a smaller drive. My first laptop was an Apple Powerbook G3. The PB's hard drive was a tiny (by todays standards) 2gb!!!! I would imagine that Tim has never felt the need to change this- but as a timesaver, you have a very good point. :)
I know the first two requests are going to be hard to code- but I think it will be highly worth it. I imagine though that we will have to wait a while (Shark v10?), but I'm here patient and waiting (fingers crossed!). :D