logo
NOTICE:  This is the new PunchCAD forum. You should have received an email with your new password around August 27, 2014. If you did not, or would like it reset, simply use the Lost Password feature, and enter Answer as the security answer.
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
jol  
#1 Posted : Monday, April 9, 2007 9:18:18 PM(UTC)
jol

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/26/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,156

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
This should be the easiest thing to do in CAD

Computers are perfect for taking inputs and negating numbers

However, as ever .. what you think should be a cynch .. is not !

I'd be willing to wager that the vast proportion of products, vehicles and widgets have strong elements symmetry .. if not being entirely symmetrical !

We've discussed how mirror planes could be set to automatically mirror the assets of particular groups - ala Alias Studiotools. This is not rocket science and would make the lives of users so much easier ! Can't we get prioritise this. I feel like I'm going to be old and arthritic before I get to use such tools.

What really drives me nuts though is making splines symmetical:
It's just not that easy !

Take a simple 3 point spline. Nudge one tangent tail up by perhaps 10mm .. and the other tangent tail down by 10. You'd think that would be a symmetrical spline .. but it ain't !

We desperately need to be able to click and "make symmetrical, enter point of symmetry .. "

The workarounds otherwise for setting up a symmetrical surface network curves are just tedious !

I'd like to see more provisions throughout the toolkit for dealing with symmetrical objects .. which presently is a pain in the butt !

1. making splines symmetrical .. simply as ass right now !
2. mirroring given objects by group (given axis)
3. within the 'match surface' tool, an option to "make centreline tangent" (by axis)
4. better support for instances (lines, splines, surfaces etc !!)
.. and so on
jlm  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, April 10, 2007 1:04:27 AM(UTC)
jlm

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/18/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,252
Man
France
Location: Paris & Frankfurt

Thanks: 217 times
Was thanked: 164 time(s) in 101 post(s)
Yes, I agree strongly with Jol, automatic symmerty would be a great improvement.
I'd like to see symmetry before icy cimetery.:o
JL
ALBANO  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, April 10, 2007 2:19:24 AM(UTC)
ALBANO

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/20/2007(UTC)
Posts: 302
Man
Germany

Thanks: 6 times
Was thanked: 28 time(s) in 15 post(s)
Yes!
I second that!
I design aircraft and there is no greater pain as to have the entire model ready and than hear from the milling guys: "Hey you have like 3 places where your wings are not like the other side!! Is this intentional?"
Just because i "forgot" to apply the same changes on both sides.
:cool:

ALBANO
jol  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, April 10, 2007 3:39:48 AM(UTC)
jol

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/26/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,156

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
:o

Good for a 'round' trip !
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.