Punch! CAD
»
ViaCAD & Shark
»
Surface Modeling
»
another Guide Cover Surface tool question
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 1/16/2015(UTC) Posts: 351
Thanks: 49 times Was thanked: 43 time(s) in 30 post(s)
has anyone figured out how to use the "
Guide Cover Surface " tool starting with a concave curve/perimeter?? the perimeter is closed and the guide curve is coincident on both ends.....
see attached example. should I be attempting to use a different tool?
if concave curves/perimeters are just a "problem" for the current tool set, I suggest that getting concave curve/perimeter functionality/capability needs to be added to the "to do" list of enhancement !!!
Art
[email protected] Art Smith attached the following image(s):
guide cover surface tool questions.jpg
(44kb) downloaded 7 time(s). You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 4/17/2015(UTC)
Posts: 256
Location: Berlin
Thanks: 17 times Was thanked: 72 time(s) in 51 post(s)
The problem of surface modeling interests me for a long time. I came to the conclusion that the Shark/VC works well only with simple shapes.
Guide Cover Tool works well with open and closed curves. But the curves must be symmetrical, have few points, the angle between U/V curves is not more than 45°. Any deviations lead to unpredictable results.
Unfortunately, all of the above also applies to solid modeling. All solid utilities(blending, shelling, bending etc...) work well only with simple objects. Perhaps it is normal for industrial produkt modeling. I do not know. But for concepting, sketching and prototyping it is a real problem.
digitalphaser attached the following image(s):
cwg8.jpg
(141kb) downloaded 4 time(s). cwg9.jpg
(104kb) downloaded 4 time(s). You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 4/17/2015(UTC)
Posts: 256
Location: Berlin
Thanks: 17 times Was thanked: 72 time(s) in 51 post(s)
My favorite alternative method for similar tasks is Net Surface Tool. Although this tool is also very limited.
By the way, I express only my point of view. More experienced and advanced users can have a more qualified solution.
Edited by user Thursday, April 19, 2018 3:05:24 AM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
digitalphaser attached the following image(s):
cwg10.jpg
(119kb) downloaded 5 time(s). You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 2/2/2007(UTC)
Posts: 5,447
Was thanked: 502 time(s) in 353 post(s)
Cover surfaces do some some limits regarding the input curves. The boundary curves need to be connected and plane projectable (the guides need to project within the boundary curves). Below is a link to a video and PDF overview describing some of the functionality for Cover with Guides.
http://www.masterviacad.com/videos/cover/index.html Tim
Edited by user Friday, April 20, 2018 3:23:26 PM(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
Tim Olson IMSI Design/Encore
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 4/17/2015(UTC)
Posts: 256
Location: Berlin
Thanks: 17 times Was thanked: 72 time(s) in 51 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Tim Olson Cover surfaces do some some limits regarding the input curves. The boundary curves need to be connected and plane projectable (the guides need to project within the boundary curves). Below is a link to a video and PDF overview describing some of the functionality for Cover with Guides.
http://www.masterviacad.com/videos/cover/index.html Tim
Nice. I just do not understand. Is it good or bad? Your video demonstrates a few primitive examples. As advertising it works well. It would be nice to notify users in advance about some limitations of this tool.
I do not understand also why is
Spline Surface needed if it does not work in most cases. Although this theme deserves a separate topic. Spline Surface has a lot of absurdities too.
digitalphaser attached the following image(s):
cwg11.jpg
(107kb) downloaded 2 time(s). You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 1/16/2015(UTC) Posts: 351
Thanks: 49 times Was thanked: 43 time(s) in 30 post(s)
Tim-
thanks for posting the Advanced Covering section of the documentation. a "cover-to-cover" read of the material confirmed I was at least using the correct approach; closed perimeter with no gaps (trailing edge closed with an arc tangent to both splines from AeroPack and verified with PowerPack) and a guide curve that falls within the projected outline of the cover perimeter....... the "Cover Surface" tool (ie: without the guide curve) produces a surface so I concluded the perimeter on the curious concave surface wasn't the problem! grasping for straws, I switched to the "Loft Guide Surface" tool and obtained a non-solution which was viewed as
major progress from the cryptic error message produced by the "Cover Guide Surface" tool!! based on the convoluted shape of the non-solution surface produced by the "Loft Guide Surface" tool I guessed SharkCAD Pro thought the opportunity was over constrained...... after splitting both the perimeter curve and the guide curve, the "Loft Guide Surface" tool produced surfaces consistent with my expectations given the inputs!! unlike the math I struggled with decades ago, SharkCAD Pro appears to like working half the opportunity at a time and does
NOT appreciate symmetric boundary conditions. see attached image.
Art
[email protected] Art Smith attached the following image(s):
guide cover surface tool questions 2.jpg
(52kb) downloaded 6 time(s). You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 2/2/2007(UTC)
Posts: 5,447
Was thanked: 502 time(s) in 353 post(s)
Hi Art Do you have just the boundary curves and guide curves in a file? I can check using the cover surface. Tim
Tim Olson IMSI Design/Encore
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 1/16/2015(UTC) Posts: 351
Thanks: 49 times Was thanked: 43 time(s) in 30 post(s)
Tim-
guide cover surface fault isolation file attached, thanks!
Art
[email protected] File Attachment(s):
cover guide surface fault isolation file.sfx
(27kb) downloaded 7 time(s). You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 9/12/2009(UTC)
Posts: 608
Location: In my place
Was thanked: 59 time(s) in 51 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Art Smith Looks like one end of the center curve is not really attached to the other end points of the other two outside curves. You can just use the skin surface and adjust via the data options.
FX 7-FXPro14-1650
MacPro 11.7.4
2x2.8GHz Quad Xeon 32GB
NVIDIA 4 K5000 4GB
Work
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 2/2/2007(UTC)
Posts: 5,447
Was thanked: 502 time(s) in 353 post(s)
>>guide cover surface fault isolation file attached, thanks! Art, no luck with this file yet... Tim
Tim Olson IMSI Design/Encore
Punch! CAD
»
ViaCAD & Shark
»
Surface Modeling
»
another Guide Cover Surface tool question
Forum Jump
Punch! CAD
ViaCAD & Shark
- News and Announcements
- General
- 2D Drafting
- Surface Modeling
- Solid Modeling
- Subdivision Modeling
- Rendering & Display
- Import/Export
- Tips and Tutorials
- Suggestions
- Gallery
- PowerPack
- Punch Lounge
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.