logo
NOTICE:  This is the new PunchCAD forum. You should have received an email with your new password around August 27, 2014. If you did not, or would like it reset, simply use the Lost Password feature, and enter Answer as the security answer.
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
rocsci  
#1 Posted : Monday, August 29, 2011 6:09:21 PM(UTC)
rocsci

Rank: Junior Member

Joined: 10/10/2009(UTC)
Posts: 5

I imported a jpg image of a section view of a large radial engine (attached). The sectioning is such that I can measure the true diameter of two different cylinders. Using the dimension tool gives a length of 0.95" for each cylinder. I know that this dimension is actually 6.125".

Is it possible to specify to ViaCad v6 that length thereby setting the unit length for the entire drawing? BTW, that's something I was able to do easily in DesignCad several years ago.
rocsci attached the following image(s):
TClongXC_2.jpg (96kb) downloaded 0 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
billbedford  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, August 30, 2011 2:22:15 AM(UTC)
billbedford

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/19/2007(UTC)
Posts: 186

You can scale the jpg by 6.125/0.95 to get it to the correct size, but check that both vertical and horizontal dimensions should be scaled by the same amount.
Select the edge of the jpg to apply any operation to it.
rocsci  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, August 30, 2011 7:24:03 PM(UTC)
rocsci

Rank: Junior Member

Joined: 10/10/2009(UTC)
Posts: 5

Your tip led me to the correct conclusion. I don't know whether the scale function has changed between V6 and V7, but, eventually, I was able to decipher what the various points that the command requires actually mean. Getting the scale factor in was easy, but I don't understand why I need to specify the final point. Telling the program what to scale and the scale factor should be sufficient. In V6, one can specify uniform scaling and scale factor. As I said, that should be sufficient.

Also, it would be very nice if one were able to go from the tool box function directly to the documentation to get the terms defined.

Of course, this isn't rocket science - rocket science is a lot easier!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.