logo
NOTICE:  This is the new PunchCAD forum. You should have received an email with your new password around August 27, 2014. If you did not, or would like it reset, simply use the Lost Password feature, and enter Answer as the security answer.
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error
Antoine's Wishlist for Shark 7.5 (#3201)
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Previous Topic Next Topic
la mouche  
#1 Posted : Wednesday, June 23, 2010 8:10:26 AM(UTC)
la mouche

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 3/14/2007(UTC)
Posts: 757
suggestions and requests for the future (near?) version of SharkFX.

1. click on the layer ---> highlights the objects in the scene.

2. click on an object ---> highlights the layer for this object.

3. preview mode for rotating and mirror function.

4. radiosity calculations much faster. currently, it is absolutely innutilisable ---> see competition with other programs.

5. correct .., completely rebuild the user interface rendering.
---> We do not know now, what materials for what object...

6. possibility zoom in very, very near to the ends of splines, lines.

7. correct rethink the text mode ----> edition of the text directly on the text and not in "inspector"

8. tubing with different sections to choose ---> square, rectangle, triangle, oval, etc..

9. possiblility to distort the cut surfaces.

10. a preview ---->smoothed, fluid
11. cages deformation on volumes ---> twisting, stretching, etc..

i'm industrial designer, I do not use Shark for modeling type "body automotive". mode surface is too rigid.

12. correct settings of perspective. more ergonomic please.

13. please, please, to enter into a model in OpenGL and rendered mode. ----> For architectural projects

14. correct the many bugs in the 2d mode technical drawings. please, more professionalism in the engineering drawing 2d mode.

15. remove "pattern" on the lines. Just style mode.

16. and finally ... the cake: a library of screws ---> parameter!

Thanks and cordialy

Antoine
Back to top
blowlamp  
#2 Posted : Wednesday, June 23, 2010 9:05:53 AM(UTC)
blowlamp

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 6/28/2008(UTC)
Posts: 648
Antoine.
I'm not in need of many of your requests because I'm not designing very complicated parts with my copy of ViaCAD Pro.
I do agree with point number 14 that you make. As much of my work is reverse engineering parts, I have no drawings or dimensions to work to other than those I can extract by measurement and common sense. Because of this, things like being able to make curves easily tangential in all circumstances without resorting to construction, is something I would look for in an update.

As for point 8 of your list. Why don't you just use the One Rail Sweep Solid tool with as many Closed Profiles as you need? It seems to give what you want and is very quick too.

Martin.
Back to top
jol  
#3 Posted : Wednesday, June 23, 2010 9:28:33 AM(UTC)
jol

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/26/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,156

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
I think your no's 1 and 2 are brilliant !!

.. and I like no 3 too !!

[With respect, my point was to try to focus the team on urgent and manageable changes in 7.5 - they would need to be fairly modest : only urgent and manageable tasks are going to be feasible. Realistically - things like rewriting the rendering interface is not going to happen in a non-major release]
Back to top
la mouche  
#4 Posted : Friday, June 25, 2010 2:46:08 PM(UTC)
la mouche

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 3/14/2007(UTC)
Posts: 757
hello, it's ... very long to align the sections on non-planar spline, exemple: a helical.

Tubing in the path axis would be extra and much simpler.
with sections of your choice.

cordialy

Antoine
Back to top
blowlamp  
#5 Posted : Friday, June 25, 2010 3:25:52 PM(UTC)
blowlamp

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 6/28/2008(UTC)
Posts: 648
Antoine.
I find that careful use of the C key and having the workplane set to Global allows me to get the results I need in these situations. Have you tried this without success?

Martin.
Back to top
ZeroLengthCurve  
#6 Posted : Monday, June 28, 2010 1:23:50 PM(UTC)
ZeroLengthCurve

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 5/15/2008(UTC)
Posts: 992

Thanks: 20 times
Was thanked: 43 time(s) in 27 post(s)
How about a preview of "preserve annotations" before committing? Yesterday, i for the very first time tried out saving PDFs from VCP and after a few hiccups, i was printing my butt off, enjoying exploring it. But, i got really confused when i suddenly realized that after printing i couldn't see my text. Apparently, it downsized so small to match the drawing and paper relationships. I had to do maybe 15 undo steps to get to see the final undo for "undo preserve annotations".

But, that undo took maybe 5 minutes to finish. At the very end, it started regenning surfaces. I was stupefyed. Undoing preserve annotations requires regenning the model? I am glad i didn't have any offending geometry and my model didn't crash. I then did save-as so i could have a save point.

How about a 3-D print preview of a model to paper? I know it's there, somewhere, but i better look again.
Back to top
la mouche  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, June 29, 2010 2:09:56 AM(UTC)
la mouche

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 3/14/2007(UTC)
Posts: 757
hello, Blowlamp

I am very familiar with the work placement sections with the "C"

but ... This is very long and does not give the result I want
example: between two sections you must have an effect [COLOR="Red"]"curve, blending"[/COLOR] on the path.

calculating the numbers click between "the solution several sections on a path with the "C" - and the my solution I propose:

------

1 - classical solution "C" button with "guid skin solid":

1.1 - build 1 (or 2-3-4 ...) path - spline
1.2 - place with the key "C" the sections (square) along the road, about 5 and build each time the

Result: [COLOR="Red"]20 click!
[/COLOR]
--------------

2 - solution pipe with (1 only) section: "Antoine proposal"

2.1 - build one path - spline
2.2 - build the (1) only section (square)
2.2 - select the path and the (1) only section.

Result: about [COLOR="lime"]4 click![/COLOR]

and hop! finished :)))
Back to top
blowlamp  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, June 29, 2010 5:06:04 AM(UTC)
blowlamp

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 6/28/2008(UTC)
Posts: 648
Antoine.
I thought you wanted to do like in the attached file. Have I misunderstood you?
It took very little effort to do them. I didn't use Guide Skin Solid, I used One Rail Sweep Solid and selected 2 or more closed profiles to be swept along the curve.

Martin.
File Attachment(s):
Antoine.vcp (624kb) downloaded 0 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Back to top
la mouche  
#9 Posted : Tuesday, June 29, 2010 6:54:25 AM(UTC)
la mouche

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 3/14/2007(UTC)
Posts: 757
hello,

Thanks Blowlamp,

I take your file to my argument:

your examples are simple because they are on flat paths.


in fact, my real question is ...:

[COLOR="Red"]Tim? can you implement in a NEW function pipe ---> as the new function reference volume on the face, as (duplicate path)? to avoid the section twist on the path to normal and remains the face of the volume on which the path is placed?[/COLOR]

see my demo.

http://screencast.com/t/NDQ3Y2IzYz

cordialy and thanks for your participation.

Antoine
Back to top
jlm  
#10 Posted : Wednesday, July 7, 2010 1:35:31 AM(UTC)
jlm

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/18/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,252
Man
France
Location: Paris & Frankfurt

Thanks: 217 times
Was thanked: 164 time(s) in 101 post(s)
Hi Antoine,
I support your wish list !
Your video about profile twisting is very clear. It also happened to me several times.
Thanks,
JL
Back to top
WWW
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF.NET 2.1.2 | YAF.NET © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET