logo
NOTICE:  This is the new PunchCAD forum. You should have received an email with your new password around August 27, 2014. If you did not, or would like it reset, simply use the Lost Password feature, and enter Answer as the security answer.
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error
Unable to correctly add solids - There are always some misalignment happening.
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Previous Topic Next Topic
WORP3  
#1 Posted : Tuesday, August 21, 2018 8:38:22 AM(UTC)
WORP3

Rank: Guest

Joined: 10/13/2017(UTC)
Posts: 48
Netherlands

Thanks: 17 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
For some unknown reason I keep getting a faulty solid addition, look at test.jpg. When I add to two objects present inside the test.vcp I shoul not getting those two lines inside my solid but for some reason there is always a very small misalignment which causes the adding to fail. Even when i'm snapping to the end points i'm getting correct/same coordinates.

So inside my test.vcp are two solids which should become one, like in the succes.jpg example (Yes it succeeded once but need it both sides). I already redrew this part over and over again but I keep getting a misalignment.
Am I doing something wrong, is there a snap point misalignment which is causing to corrupt some coordinates while drawing the second part, or is there a fault inside the add solids. Is there maybe a way to correct the faulty added solid (Just remove those wrong lines).

I'm in with this problem for hours and i'm starting to get frustrated :( Hopefully someone can help me out.



File Attachment(s):
test.vcp (56kb) downloaded 4 time(s).
WORP3 attached the following image(s):
test.JPG (40kb) downloaded 1 time(s).
Succes.JPG (30kb) downloaded 0 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Back to top
WWW
L. Banasky  
#2 Posted : Tuesday, August 21, 2018 10:01:42 AM(UTC)
L. Banasky

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/16/2007(UTC)
Posts: 597

Thanks: 139 times
Was thanked: 141 time(s) in 100 post(s)
There were multiple parts. It looks like it was a solid to begin with.
I deleted some groups, and 2 parts, and what was left is a solid.
Larry
L. Banasky attached the following image(s):
Add Solids.jpg (35kb) downloaded 4 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Back to top
thanks 1 user thanked L. Banasky for this useful post.
WORP3 on 8/21/2018(UTC)
WORP3  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, August 21, 2018 11:11:17 AM(UTC)
WORP3

Rank: Guest

Joined: 10/13/2017(UTC)
Posts: 48
Netherlands

Thanks: 17 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Originally Posted by: L. Banasky Go to Quoted Post
There were multiple parts. It looks like it was a solid to begin with.
I deleted some groups, and 2 parts, and what was left is a solid.
Larry


Thanks for your quick reply. If i'm not mistaken there are two solids, one polygon and two 2D groups. The questions where about the two solids. When I add them together with the add solid function, they are in fact sticking together but both top surfaces of the two solids don't merge together like they should do.
Can you explain a bit what you did? Maybe look with the hidden line view if the two surfaces are really merged together?

I've added an added.vcp where I added those two solids together, maybe you can see what's going on and why the two surface aren't merged?

File Attachment(s):
Added.vcp (92kb) downloaded 3 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Back to top
WWW
L. Banasky  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, August 21, 2018 11:38:39 AM(UTC)
L. Banasky

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/16/2007(UTC)
Posts: 597

Thanks: 139 times
Was thanked: 141 time(s) in 100 post(s)
Don't exactly know what you are trying to do, but there is
already 2 solids to work with. Delete the one solid and the polygon groups
and copy the good solid if you need more than one.
Larry
L. Banasky attached the following image(s):
Two Solids.jpg (37kb) downloaded 5 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Back to top
WORP3  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, August 21, 2018 12:00:01 PM(UTC)
WORP3

Rank: Guest

Joined: 10/13/2017(UTC)
Posts: 48
Netherlands

Thanks: 17 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Originally Posted by: L. Banasky Go to Quoted Post
Don't exactly know what you are trying to do, but there is
already 2 solids to work with. Delete the one solid and the polygon groups
and copy the good solid if you need more than one.
Larry


The two solids are those I want to add together in one solid but after adding the top surface should be one continues surface (like I shaded a bit with the blue lines) not two. See example below where I extended the top a bit. This is how the beginning of the bent should look like, not with a line in it separating the top surface.

Edited by user Tuesday, August 21, 2018 12:01:47 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

WORP3 attached the following image(s):
OneSurface.JPG (36kb) downloaded 0 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Back to top
WWW
WORP3  
#6 Posted : Wednesday, August 22, 2018 10:00:52 AM(UTC)
WORP3

Rank: Guest

Joined: 10/13/2017(UTC)
Posts: 48
Netherlands

Thanks: 17 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
I've tried some more today and it seems that when i'm re-creating the part inside a new document that i don't have any problems :(
When I zoom in to a maximum level it seems that the vertices of the part that I want to add to the base part, is misaligned like a few nanometer. Is there a way to enter new coordinates to a vertices, like click them with a special function and enter new 3D coordinates?
Back to top
WWW
L. Banasky  
#7 Posted : Thursday, August 23, 2018 2:10:05 PM(UTC)
L. Banasky

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/16/2007(UTC)
Posts: 597

Thanks: 139 times
Was thanked: 141 time(s) in 100 post(s)
I split the solid, and moved the end piece in .0005",
and then added them. There was a slight gap.
Hope this is what you wanted.
Larry

Sorry, I might have chosen the wrong solid, I've
been confused from the beginning.

Edited by user Friday, August 24, 2018 6:27:55 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

File Attachment(s):
Split Solid.sfx (71kb) downloaded 1 time(s).
L. Banasky attached the following image(s):
Split Solid.jpg (39kb) downloaded 0 time(s).
Split Solid2.jpg (49kb) downloaded 0 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Back to top
thanks 1 user thanked L. Banasky for this useful post.
WORP3 on 8/24/2018(UTC)
WORP3  
#8 Posted : Friday, August 24, 2018 12:23:45 PM(UTC)
WORP3

Rank: Guest

Joined: 10/13/2017(UTC)
Posts: 48
Netherlands

Thanks: 17 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
That's about what I wanted, it should get one solid without any interruption as an other program will calculate bends and sizes from this. It will fail if the solid is broken in two because of those little gapt.
I viewed a lot of movies about ViaCad Pro and I also figured it out on how to correct this misalignment problem.

The thing i'm still wondering why there is a gap in the first place as I always use snap point and workplanes to prevent such wrong vertices coordinates. Why isn't there an option that round-off all of the coordinates to a specific resolution. Say for in my example to 0.01mm which is more then enough for this design.

Thanks.

WORP3 attached the following image(s):
Succeeded.JPG (24kb) downloaded 1 time(s).
Succeeded2.JPG (15kb) downloaded 1 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Back to top
WWW
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF.NET 2.1.2 | YAF.NET © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET