logo
NOTICE:  This is the new PunchCAD forum. You should have received an email with your new password around August 27, 2014. If you did not, or would like it reset, simply use the Lost Password feature, and enter Answer as the security answer.
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error
Tangent cover (#2333)
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Previous Topic Next Topic
Steve.M  
#1 Posted : Friday, May 22, 2009 11:50:39 AM(UTC)
Steve.M

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 6/18/2008(UTC)
Posts: 978

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
When creating a Tangent cover from 4 sides that are equal, then I would of expected the bulge to be central, but is not (see pic)

When changing the bulge value, the bulge shifts position.



- Steve
File Attachment(s):
Tangent cover.vcp (55kb) downloaded 5 time(s).
Steve.M attached the following image(s):
tcs.jpg (59kb) downloaded 5 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Back to top
Steve.M  
#2 Posted : Saturday, May 23, 2009 6:32:41 AM(UTC)
Steve.M

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 6/18/2008(UTC)
Posts: 978

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
I thought the problem may have been due to my using straight sides, but even with curved sides it still does not look right.
Steve.M attached the following image(s):
2009-05-23_132639.jpg (100kb) downloaded 5 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Back to top
unique  
#3 Posted : Saturday, May 23, 2009 2:20:39 PM(UTC)
unique

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 6/24/2008(UTC)
Posts: 591
Originally Posted by: Steve.M Go to Quoted Post
When creating a Tangent cover from 4 sides that are equal, then I would of expected the bulge to be central, but is not (see pic)

When changing the bulge value, the bulge shifts position.



- Steve


Yip....I had my troubles too and in the end I gave up with VC for surfacing and returned to Rhino :( it just works!!

Tim - Can you show us if this is possible in VC or what workaround to use ?
unique attached the following image(s):
rhino.jpg (12kb) downloaded 5 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Back to top
jol  
#4 Posted : Saturday, May 23, 2009 3:50:44 PM(UTC)
jol

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/26/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,156

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
you need the tangent cover surface tool !?
Back to top
jol  
#5 Posted : Saturday, May 23, 2009 3:55:14 PM(UTC)
jol

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/26/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,156

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
agree - it does seem silly that continuity is not also an option within the normal cover surf tool
Back to top
Steve.M  
#6 Posted : Sunday, May 24, 2009 6:30:53 AM(UTC)
Steve.M

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 6/18/2008(UTC)
Posts: 978

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Originally Posted by: unique Go to Quoted Post
Yip....I had my troubles too and in the end I gave up with VC for surfacing and returned to Rhino
I can certainly understand. I will say that if I had purchased VC for work/production then I would of removed it some time go. It does make me wonder what others are using this product for, and why these problems are simply ignored by Vendor and users attempt endless workarounds.
Originally Posted by: unique Go to Quoted Post

Tim - Can you show us if this is possible in VC
I think this thread will be another IbT


- Steve
Back to top
Steve.M  
#7 Posted : Sunday, May 24, 2009 6:46:20 AM(UTC)
Steve.M

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 6/18/2008(UTC)
Posts: 978

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Originally Posted by: jol Go to Quoted Post
you need the tangent cover surface tool !?


Are you serious?

I would like the tools I upgraded for to be more than just icons on the screen.


- Steve
Back to top
jol  
#8 Posted : Sunday, May 24, 2009 11:57:05 AM(UTC)
jol

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/26/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,156

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
I just tried again and you're quite right - it seems slightly lop-sided if I use the standard tool .. & it shouldn't !

However, if I use the tangent-cover-with-guide and put a point in the middle for the surface to pass thru (act as guide) - it "seems" good .. but you're very welcome to prove me wrong

That all said - a one-click-cover-with-tangency should be easy-peasy
jol attached the following image(s):
tangent cover with guide.jpg (24kb) downloaded 5 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Back to top
jol  
#9 Posted : Sunday, May 24, 2009 12:06:59 PM(UTC)
jol

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/26/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,156

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Tim, sort your bulges out

A. for lop-sided-ness .. I find even with a guide, adding extra bulge means I'm 'dressing to the left'

B. for range .. why does this tool use a bulge factor range of 1 to 0 .. 0 being lots and 1 being little ?

FYI .. The deform tool has a default value of 500 and you often need 10000 to get a good result (.. and a higher number gives more bulge)

You need to audit all these tool and pick a reasonable scale .. say 1 incrementing to 10 .. and stick with it !

This kind of stuff should be behind us
Back to top
Steve.M  
#10 Posted : Sunday, May 24, 2009 12:25:50 PM(UTC)
Steve.M

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 6/18/2008(UTC)
Posts: 978

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Originally Posted by: jol Go to Quoted Post
However, if I use the tangent-cover-with-guide and put a point in the middle for the surface to pass thru (act as guide) - it "seems" good .. but you're very welcome to prove me wrong


I dont have Shark to create that surface. Can you post the surface and I will check it in another application. I know that currently points do not keep tangency.

I currently see no point in my upgrading to Shark to obtain tangent cover with guides as the standard tangent cover should give more expected results in the example I posted. Also: there are far too many problems with other base functions to make upgrade.
Back to top
Tim Olson  
#11 Posted : Friday, May 29, 2009 10:51:39 PM(UTC)
Tim Olson

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/2/2007(UTC)
Posts: 5,447
United States

Was thanked: 499 time(s) in 353 post(s)
Steve,

Can you try a bulge factor of zero?

A lower bulge factor will represent the initial first derivatives of the referenced surfaces. A non zero bulge factor will use a Spatial algorithm attempting to minimize energy across the surface. I'm not sure why, but in those surfaces you provided, that resulting algorithm is not symmetrical. I'll need to send that part to Spatial for an explanation.


Tim
Tim Olson
IMSI Design/Encore
Back to top
dudko  
#12 Posted : Saturday, May 30, 2009 9:00:40 AM(UTC)
dudko

Rank: Junior Member

Joined: 4/20/2009(UTC)
Posts: 29
Originally Posted by: Tim Olson Go to Quoted Post
Steve,

Can you try a bulge factor of zero?

A lower bulge factor will represent the initial first derivatives of the referenced surfaces. A non zero bulge factor will use a Spatial algorithm attempting to minimize energy across the surface. I'm not sure why, but in those surfaces you provided, that resulting algorithm is not symmetrical. I'll need to send that part to Spatial for an explanation.


Tim

Hi Tim
Bulge factor of zero is the same, not correct for CAD
Regards Ed
dudko attached the following image(s):
TC.jpg (85kb) downloaded 5 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
Back to top
jol  
#13 Posted : Saturday, May 30, 2009 9:40:36 AM(UTC)
jol

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/26/2007(UTC)
Posts: 2,156

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Good work Ed !

Tim - do you have enuf examples of this lopp-sidedness to get this off to Spatial ?
Back to top
Steve.M  
#14 Posted : Saturday, May 30, 2009 10:42:22 AM(UTC)
Steve.M

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 6/18/2008(UTC)
Posts: 978

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Tim Olson Go to Quoted Post
Steve,

Can you try a bulge factor of zero?

I did try that but still not correct.

I see dudko had a look, and actually got a better result than my checks, so would also say the tool is unpredictable.

- Steve
Back to top
dudko  
#15 Posted : Saturday, May 30, 2009 12:50:52 PM(UTC)
dudko

Rank: Junior Member

Joined: 4/20/2009(UTC)
Posts: 29
Originally Posted by: Steve.M Go to Quoted Post
I did try that but still not correct.

I see dudko had a look, and actually got a better result than my checks

- Steve

@Steve @Jol, that was tested in sharkFX build 835, in VC6 build 833 is extremely bad. Result in SharkFX with this tool, i see tolerance +/-0,1 in VC6 i have tolerance +/-1.0 max. 0.1 (very inaccurate)
Regards Ed
Back to top
Tim Olson  
#16 Posted : Saturday, May 30, 2009 4:11:47 PM(UTC)
Tim Olson

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/2/2007(UTC)
Posts: 5,447
United States

Was thanked: 499 time(s) in 353 post(s)
>>Tim - do you have enuf examples of this lopp-sidedness to get this off to >>Spatial

Yes, will send off to Spatial to see what they say. I suspect they will classify it as an enhancement request as it does appear to make a valid G1 surface but we're asking for alternative blending thereafter.

Tim
Tim Olson
IMSI Design/Encore
Back to top
Steve.M  
#17 Posted : Sunday, May 31, 2009 12:24:57 AM(UTC)
Steve.M

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 6/18/2008(UTC)
Posts: 978

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Tim Olson Go to Quoted Post
A lower bulge factor will represent the initial first derivatives of the referenced surfaces. A non zero bulge factor will use a Spatial algorithm attempting to minimize energy across the surface. I'm not sure why, but in those surfaces you provided, that resulting algorithm is not symmetrical. I'll need to send that part to Spatial for an explanation.




Tim,

But as put forward, the initial zero bulge is incorrect. If Spatial is then calculating from that, then of course it will be incorrect and actually increase the problem, as it appears to be doing.


- Steve
Back to top
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF.NET 2.1.2 | YAF.NET © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET