logo
NOTICE:  This is the new PunchCAD forum. You should have received an email with your new password around August 27, 2014. If you did not, or would like it reset, simply use the Lost Password feature, and enter Answer as the security answer.
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Art Smith  
#1 Posted : Saturday, November 18, 2017 2:15:07 PM(UTC)
Art Smith

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 1/16/2015(UTC)
Posts: 351

Thanks: 49 times
Was thanked: 43 time(s) in 30 post(s)
cutting a solid cylinder with the "cut section" tool yields the vast majority of the time an ellipse, or probably more correctly a perimeter that looks like an ellipse. how do I establish a line tangent to a resulting perimeter that looks like an ellipse and a co-planer circle ??

if there's not currently a way to do it directly, is there a way to extract the major and minor axis from a resulting perimeter that looks like an ellipse??

Art
[email protected]
murray  
#2 Posted : Saturday, November 18, 2017 4:59:54 PM(UTC)
murray

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 9/24/2014(UTC)
Posts: 373
Australia

Thanks: 8 times
Was thanked: 104 time(s) in 85 post(s)
I did this the other day, scaled ellipses are recognised as splines so I wanted to define the figure as ellipse. Apply a bounding box to the spline, the major and minor axes can be measured from the edges of the box.
thanks 1 user thanked murray for this useful post.
Art Smith on 11/18/2017(UTC)
Art Smith  
#3 Posted : Saturday, November 18, 2017 7:03:08 PM(UTC)
Art Smith

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 1/16/2015(UTC)
Posts: 351

Thanks: 49 times
Was thanked: 43 time(s) in 30 post(s)
Murray-

thanks, very clever!! hadn't thought of a bounding box approach. "of course" it took a few more steps because the ellipse isn't aligned with the current work plane.... fortunately verify also provides max & min principle axis so a box can be constructed to enable replacing the perimeter that looks like an ellipse with a real ellipse. convoluted, but it gets there.....

Art
[email protected]
jlm  
#4 Posted : Monday, November 20, 2017 11:02:41 AM(UTC)
jlm

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/18/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,240
Man
France
Location: Paris & Frankfurt

Thanks: 209 times
Was thanked: 150 time(s) in 95 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Art Smith Go to Quoted Post

if there's not currently a way to do it directly, is there a way to extract the major and minor axis from a resulting perimeter that looks like an ellipse??
[email protected]


Hello Art,
I'm sorry to say : a scaled ellipse is not an ellipse any more.
And it's been like this since the time of Pythagorus, or maybe earlier...
I know because I did this mistake before.

Try other ways...

JL
Art Smith  
#5 Posted : Monday, November 20, 2017 2:38:16 PM(UTC)
Art Smith

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 1/16/2015(UTC)
Posts: 351

Thanks: 49 times
Was thanked: 43 time(s) in 30 post(s)
JL-

yes, but it's plenty good enough for estimating "clearance" center lines routing tubes.... it was a CAD mechanization question, not geometry.

Art
[email protected]
Art Smith attached the following image(s):
RF-00 up and back exhaust.JPG (42kb) downloaded 6 time(s).

You cannot view/download attachments. Try to login or register.
jlm  
#6 Posted : Monday, November 20, 2017 4:29:46 PM(UTC)
jlm

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 2/18/2007(UTC)
Posts: 1,240
Man
France
Location: Paris & Frankfurt

Thanks: 209 times
Was thanked: 150 time(s) in 95 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Art Smith Go to Quoted Post

yes, but it's plenty good enough for estimating "clearance" center lines routing tubes.... it was a CAD mechanization question, not geometry.


I understand now.
Great routing job Art !
Thanks,
JL
Art Smith  
#7 Posted : Monday, November 20, 2017 10:19:00 PM(UTC)
Art Smith

Rank: Senior Member

Joined: 1/16/2015(UTC)
Posts: 351

Thanks: 49 times
Was thanked: 43 time(s) in 30 post(s)
JL-

thanks! the postulated structural tubes had a huge impact on the degree of difficulty and the quality of the eventual solution. the triangular tubes pushed the exhaust aft AND pushed the point of maximum frontal area aft. without the structure "in the way", normally tube #3 defines maximum width. frontal area and taper ratio are really BIG deals in everything that influences aero drag......

Art
[email protected]
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.