Rank: Member
Joined: 10/15/2010(UTC)
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
I am trying to import a model of a bearing from a mojor bearing manufacturer. I can import SAT or STP with no problem, but since they give the option to import Catia, I thought I would try. The file comes from them with a .CATscript file extension, not .CATpart. So when I import into Shark, I get nothing. Using verify object count, I can see that there is absolutely nothing in the model. What am I doing wrong ?
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 2/2/2007(UTC)
Posts: 5,447
Was thanked: 499 time(s) in 353 post(s)
Hi Ryan
Tim Olson
Rank: Member
Joined: 10/15/2010(UTC)
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
I will continue to import as SAT then. What would the advantages of Catia be over this format ?
Rank: Senior Member
Joined: 2/2/2007(UTC)
Posts: 5,447
Was thanked: 499 time(s) in 353 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Ryan Anderson I will continue to import as SAT then. What would the advantages of Catia be over this format ?
For CATIA V5 translation, we use the same DLLs as in the CATIA V5 application. It's pretty good with bringing over surfaces and solids.
The guys at Lockheed have given the CATIA V4 and V5 translator a good work out.
http://blog.punchcad.com/index....full-scale-display-model I typically recommend SAT only if the other system is based on ACIS (not a translation, native format import).
Tim
Tim Olson
Forum Jump
Punch! CAD
ViaCAD & Shark
- News and Announcements
- General
- 2D Drafting
- Surface Modeling
- Solid Modeling
- Subdivision Modeling
- Rendering & Display
- Import/Export
- Tips and Tutorials
- Suggestions
- Gallery
- PowerPack
- Punch Lounge
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
cannot reply to topics in this forum.
cannot delete your posts in this forum.
cannot edit your posts in this forum.
cannot create polls in this forum.
cannot vote in polls in this forum.
